🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.